Water wheel / pelton turbine 
Controlled explosion in a gas / diesel motor / engine 
controlled explosion and controlled exhaust of a jet engine 
Steam pressure against a piston - steam engine
Wind pressure (force) against a sail
What do we know about the Fundamental Forces? Here are some things that I know.
Engineer Xavier Borg offers the following observations about the simularity of three of the five forces field equations, from EMRP Push Gravity Theory: Introduction.
"The equations governing the three different force fields are:
Electrostatic Force F = KQ1Q2/R2 .... K=1/4pieo, Q= charge, R = distance
Gravitational Force F = GM1M2/R2 .... G= gravitational constant, M= mass, R = distance
Magnetic Force F = UM1M2/R2 .... U=1/u, M= magnetic monopoles strength, R = distance
One immediately observes that each force field equation has its own constant of proportionality, but otherwise, seem to be analogous to each other. Looking at the SI units of force that is Kgm/s2 doesn't help much, but here is where the new ST system of units comes to rescue. The similarity between them can be best explained by analyzing the space time dimensions of force itself. The dimensions of ANY force field in ST units are T/S2.... T=time, S=distance. So, we see that the inverse square law (S-2) is not something directly related to magnetism, electric fields or gravity, but is contained in the definition of force itself."
Engineer Borg is right about the "each force field equation has its own constant of
proportionality, but otherwise, seems to be analogous to each other", but only if you ignore
the fact that two of the three forces have a dual nature, pull AND push. Gravity only has
the nature of a "pull".
He doesn't seem to understand that the "constant of proportionality" is the "volume of action" ratio,
since these forces all have the "mysterious" ability to cause "action-at-a-distance".
The Gravitational constant "G" = 6.6730 x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2
The Electrostatic constant "kC" ~ 8.988 x 109 N m2 C-2
The Coulomb force constant "e0" ~ 8.854 x 10-12 N-1 m-2 C2
In regards to the definition of force, T/S2.... T=time, S=distance,
I see the direct correspondence to the definition of "FLOW".
Macro examples of forces as a "flow" of a fluid (in declining visiblity of the fluid) are:
Water wheel / pelton turbine
Controlled explosion in a gas / diesel motor / engine
controlled explosion and controlled exhaust of a jet engine
Steam pressure against a piston - steam engine
Wind pressure (force) against a sail Even though the "action-at-a-distance" effects have no visible fluids, the equivalent results require equivalent rationales.
| GRAVITY | Strength 6 x 10-39 * |
Range (m) Infinite or 6 x 1015 |
Direction: toward the center |
Action: always attractive |
Flow Type: Sink vortex |
WEAK |
Strength 6 x 10-6 |
Range (m) 10-18 |
Direction: toward the center |
Action: always attractive |
Flow Type: Sink vortex |
|
STRONG |
Strength 1 |
Range (m) 10-15 |
Direction: toward the center |
Action: always attractive |
Flow Type: Sink vortex |
|
| ELECTRO- MAGNETIC |
Strength 7.3 -3 |
Range Infinite |
Direction: toward other ferrites |
Action: attractive and pushing |
Flow Type: Torus spiral |
| GYROSCOPIC | Strength ~3 -3 ** |
Range a few centimeters |
Direction: outward from center |
Action: resist tipping |
Flow Type: Donut spiral |
* The numeric values were taken from the web-site of Georgia State University, although other web-sites differ slightly.
** This numeric value is my estimate, since NO "real physicist" will even acknowlege the existance of a seperate gyroscopic force.
ERGO: All forces-at-a-distance are the direct result of an Aether flow.
Thank you for dropping by.
Live Long and Prosper!
Norm Silliman
Web Page Design by 21st Century Designs